Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Biotechnology for Biofuels and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

A highly efficient β-glucosidase from the buffalo rumen fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum W5

Hsin-Liang Chen1, Yo-Chia Chen2, Mei-Yeh Jade Lu1, Jui-Jen Chang13, Hiaow-Ting Christine Wang3, Huei-Mien Ke17, Tzi-Yuan Wang1, Sz-Kai Ruan1, Tao-Yuan Wang1, Kuo-Yen Hung3, Hsing-Yi Cho456, Wan-Ting Lin6, Ming-Che Shih468* and Wen-Hsiung Li1389*

Author Affiliations

1 Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan

2 Department of Biological Science & Technology, National Pingtung University of Science & Technology, Neipu Hsiang, Pingtung, 91201, Taiwan

3 Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan

4 Molecular and Biological Agricultural Sciences Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, National Chung-Hsing University – Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan

5 Graduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, 402, Taiwan

6 Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan

7 Program in Microbial Genomics, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, 402, Taiwan

8 Biotechnology Center, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, 402, Taiwan

9 Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Biotechnology for Biofuels 2012, 5:24  doi:10.1186/1754-6834-5-24


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/5/1/24


Received:21 November 2011
Accepted:19 April 2012
Published:19 April 2012

© 2012 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Cellulose, which is the most abundant renewable biomass on earth, is a potential bio-resource of alternative energy. The hydrolysis of plant polysaccharides is catalyzed by microbial cellulases, including endo-β-1,4-glucanases, cellobiohydrolases, cellodextrinases, and β-glucosidases. Converting cellobiose by β-glucosidases is the key factor for reducing cellobiose inhibition and enhancing the efficiency of cellulolytic enzymes for cellulosic ethanol production.

Results

In this study, a cDNA encoding β-glucosidase was isolated from the buffalo rumen fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum W5 and is named NpaBGS. It has a length of 2,331 bp with an open reading frame coding for a protein of 776 amino acid residues, corresponding to a theoretical molecular mass of 85.1 kDa and isoelectric point of 4.4. Two GH3 catalytic domains were found at the N and C terminals of NpaBGS by sequence analysis. The cDNA was expressed in Pichia pastoris and after protein purification, the enzyme displayed a specific activity of 34.5 U/mg against cellobiose as the substrate. Enzymatic assays showed that NpaBGS was active on short cello-oligosaccharides from various substrates. A weak activity in carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) digestion indicated that the enzyme might also have the function of an endoglucanase. The optimal activity was detected at 40°C and pH 5 ~ 6, showing that the enzyme prefers a weak acid condition. Moreover, its activity could be enhanced at 50°C by adding Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions. Interestingly, in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) experiments using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 or Kluyveromyces marxianus KY3 as the fermentation yeast, NpaBGS showed advantages in cell growth, glucose production, and ethanol production over the commercial enzyme Novo 188. Moreover, we showed that the KY3 strain engineered with the NpaNGS gene can utilize 2 % dry napiergrass as the sole carbon source to produce 3.32 mg/ml ethanol when Celluclast 1.5 L was added to the SSF system.

Conclusion

Our characterizations of the novel β-glucosidase NpaBGS revealed that it has a preference of weak acidity for optimal yeast fermentation and an optimal temperature of ~40°C. Since NpaBGS performs better than Novo 188 under the living conditions of fermentation yeasts, it has the potential to be a suitable enzyme for SSF.

Keywords:
Endoglucanase; β-glucosidase; Neocallimastix patriciarum; Rumen fungi; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation

Background

Cellulose is the major component in the plant cell wall. It is a linear polymer of polysaccharide consisting of D-glucose units linked by 1,4-β-D-glucosidic bonds. The hydrolysis of plant polysaccharides is catalyzed by microbial cellulases, including endo-β-1,4-glucanases, cellobiohydrolases, cellodextrinases and β-glucosidases [1]. These cellulases are very important in various applications, including saccharification of industrial and agricultural cellulose containing residues, treating cellulose pulp wastes in the paper industry and enhancing the extraction of fermentable substances in the beer brewing and alcohol fermentation industries [2-4]. In the process of cellulose degradation, various endo-β-1,4-glucanases act randomly along the cellulose chains, producing cellulose fragments to generate new sites on which cellodextrinases act to produce cellobiose or oligosaccharides. β-glucosidases then catalyze the hydrolysis of cellobiose and oligosaccharides, which are strong inhibitors of both endo-β-1,4-glucanases and cellodextrinases [5-7]. Thus, converting cellobiose or oligosaccharides to glucose is the key factor for reducing cellobiose inhibition and enhancing the efficient of cellulolytic enzymes [5,8,9].

According to the classification by [10,11], β-glucosidase genes are typically placed into glycosyl hydrolase families 1 and 3 (GH1 and GH3). Generally, the β-glucosidases of bacterial, plant, and mammalian origins that belong to GH1 usually possess a significant level of galactosidase activity in addition to β-glucosidase activity. The other β-glucosidases of fungi, bacteria, and plants are often classified into GH3. The β-glucosidases in both families are known as retaining enzymes because their products retain the same anomeric configuration as the substrate [12]. Their reactions are thought to follow a double-displacement mechanism [12].

Cellulolytic enzymes from brown- and white-rot fungi have been extensively studied in organisms such as Trichoderma reesei and Phanerochaete chrysosporium[13-16]. It is also known that rumen fungi are able to degrade the most resistant plant cell-wall polymers and therefore are rich sources of fibrolytic enzymes with tremendous potential for industrial and agricultural applications [16-18]. Recently, we reported the transcriptomic and secretomic profiles of the rumen fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum W5 [19]. From the transcriptome, we cloned and expressed a cDNA encoding a β-glucosidase. We call this enzyme NpaBGS and have pursued a detailed characterization in the present study. The protein sequence contains two GH3 domains at the N and C terminals from a domain prediction analysis. In a heterologous expression system, the purified β-glucosidase showed the optimal activity at pH 6 and 40°C and could be significantly enhanced at 50°C by adding Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions. Furthermore, two fermentation yeasts were chosen to assess the potential of NpaBGS for the SSF process.

Results and discussion

Characterization of the β-glucosidase NpaBGS

The cloned NpaBGS cDNA contains 2,331 bp and the deduced amino acid sequence has 776 amino acid residues, with a theoretical molecular mass of 85.1 kDa and isoelectric point of 4.4 (Additional file 1). The cleavage site for the putative signal peptide is located between residues Ala20 and Ile21. Three potential N-glycosylation sites were predicted at residues 51, 223 and 532. Conserved domain prediction suggests that it is a β-glucosidase of the glycosyl hydrolase Family 3 (GH3) carrying a GH3 N-terminal domain (Pfam00933) and a GH3 C-terminal domain (Pfam01915) located at residues 62 ~ 270 and 350 ~ 577, respectively.

Additional file 1. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the NpaBGS cDNA. Amino acids are represented below the nucleotide sequence. The signal peptide is labeled with asterisks. The potential sites of N-glycosylation and activity site are shown in gothic font. The predicted domains of GH3 at the N and C terminal are underlined.

Format: TIFF Size: 1.5MB Download fileOpen Data

Based on amino acid sequences, glucosidases have been classified into several families, with most of the β-glucosidases belonging to either GH1 or GH3[10,11,20]. Comparative analyses using BlastX and ExPASy indicated that NpaBGS contains two conserved putative domains of GH3. The aspartic acid residue Asp251 in the conserved domain (GXVMXD) might be the active-site residue of NpaBGS [21-23].

Purification of NpaBGS expressed inPichia pastoris

The expression of the NpaBGS cDNA in P. pastoris GS115 was conducted under the control of the inducible promoter AOX1 on the pPICZ A vector. A 2-day culture in a medium containing 0.5 % methanol resulted in optimal enzyme production. These conditions were used in subsequent large scale cultures for enzyme purification and the results are summarized in Table 1. The pattern of fractions containing NpaBGS activities at each purification step was checked by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1A). A significant mass of the purified enzyme was estimated to be 85 kDa by SDS-PAGE analysis. The enzyme was purified 2.9-fold with a specific activity of 34.5 U/mg against cellobiose as the substrate. In addition, the β-glucosidase activity of the purified NpaBGS was examined by the zymogram assay with 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-cellobioside (MUC) staining after electrophoresis on the native PAGE (Figure 1B).

Table 1. Summary of stepwise purification of NpaBGS (β-glucosidase)

thumbnailFigure 1. SDS-PAGE and Zymogram of NpaBGS, which was expressed and purified from aPichia pastorisrecombinant strain. (A) SDS-PAGE of NpaBGS after each purification step. Lane M, protein marker; lane 1, crude extract; lane 2, condensation; lane 3, ammonium sulfate precipitation; lane 4, 1st DEAE; lane 5, 2nd DEAE. (B) Zymogram of the purified β-glucosidase in the native PAGE with MUC substrate staining.

The evidence from enzymatic assay, bioinformatics and homology modeling studies also strongly suggest that NpaBGS is a member of GH3. In NpaBGS, three putative N-glycosylation sites were found (Additional file 1), but no significant difference was observed between the calculated and the apparent molecular weight on SDS–PAGE using the Pichia expression system (Figure 1). Unlike reported cases of glycosylated β-glycosidases [12,24], there might be no or little glycosylation on NpaBGS. Furthermore, NpaBGS has also been successfully expressed in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilisKluyveromyces marxianus and K. lactis (data not shown). The enzyme with no or little glycosylation would be easier to express in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems, except for species such as S. cerevisiae that have a strong glycosylation mechanism. It will be interesting to do site-directed mutagenesis to study whether any of the three sites are actually glycosylated.

The purified NpaBGS and commercial enzyme Novo 188 were used to evaluate the effects of pH and temperature on enzymatic activity using cellobiose as the substrate. The maximum activities of NpaBGS and Novo 188 were observed at 40°C and 60°C, respectively, and NpaNGS was found to display a higher activity than Novo 188 at 40°C, though a lower activity at 60°C (Figure 2A). Both enzymes showed about 80 % residual activity at 50°C. At pH 6.0, NpaBGS showed a relative activity of 58 % at 30°C and 86 % at 50°C. The effect of pH on the hydrolysis rate was also evaluated for NpaBGS in a reaction system incubated at 40°C for 1 h. High levels of NpaBGS activity were found in a narrow pH range (5.0-6.0), peaking at pH 6.0 (Figure 2B). At pH values outside the range of 5.0 to 8.0, the relative activities decreased significantly. In contrast, Novo 188 showed an acidity-tolerance at pH 4. The activities of NpaBGS under conditions at different pH values and temperature indicated that NpaBGS prefers weak acidity as the yeast fermentation condition.

thumbnailFigure 2. Effects of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the activity of purified NpaBGS and Novo 188. The relative activities are expressed as percentage normalized to the sample with the highest activity in each test. The profile of NpaBGS was shown with a solid line, and Novo 188 with a dotted line.

Substrate specificity of NpaBGS

The NpaBGS substrate specificity was determined using the purified protein to avoid the background β-glucosidase activity of P. pastoris. All substrates were assayed at 40°C and pH 6 for 1 h. As shown in Table 2, enzyme activities were detected for natural substrates such as amygdalin, arbutin, larminarin, phenyl-β-D-glucoside, β-gentiobiose as well as cellobiose. It showed little or no activity for other sugars such as sinigrin, maltose, lactose and sucrose. For synthetic substrates, MUC and MUD were found to have the best activity, but no activity was detectable for MUG (data not shown). Moreover, when MUC was used, the enzymatic product generated measurable fluorescence, indicating that this enzyme was active on short cello-oligosaccharides (Figure 1B).

Table 2. Substrate specificity of purified NpaBGS

Most β-glucosidases can be divided into three groups with respect to their substrate specificity: (a) those that exhibit a high specificity towards aryl β-D-glucosides, (b) those that preferentially hydrolyze cellobiose and cello-oligosaccharides (also known as cellobiases), and (c) those that hydrolyze both types of substrates (i.e., broad-specificity β-glucosidases) [24]. From our experiments, NpaBGS displayed a higher activity on 4-methylumbelliferyl substrates than on cellobiose, demonstrating that NpaBGS has a very high affinity for methylumbelliferyl substrates (Table 2). In addition, NpaBGS hydrolyses CMC (Additional file 2) and MUC (Table 2), suggesting that the enzyme possesses both endo-glucanase and β-glucosidase activities [25-28]. Thus, this enzyme showed a strong β-glucosidase activity and might also possess other cellulase functions.

Additional file 2. NpaBGS enzyme activity on CMC.

Format: PDF Size: 77KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Effects of different elements on the NpaBGS activity

To study the effects of metal ions and reducing agents on the NpaBGS activity, we conducted assays in the presence of metal cations, including Al3+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+, and reducing agents, such as DTT and β-mercaptoenthanol, at the concentrations of 1 and 10 mM (Table 3). At the concentration of 1 mM, only Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+ showed significant enhancement of β-glucosidase activity compared to the reaction containing the chealator EDTA. When the concentration was increased to 10 mM, Al3+, Cu2+ and Fe2+ all showed significant inhibition of enzymatic activity; Al3+ and Cu2+ almost abolished the function. In contrast, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+ showed significant enhancement of β-glucosidase activity, especially for Mg2+ and Mn2+, which showed very strong enhancement (Table 3). Supplementing either DTT or β-mercaptoenthanol showed no apparent effects on enzymatic activity under the condition tested.

Table 3. Effect of metal ions and reducing agents on the activity of purified NpaBGS

We examined whether Mg2+ and Mn2+ could enhance pH or temperature tolerance of NpaBGS. We found no effect of these ions on pH tolerance (data not shown), but addition of either cation increased NpaBGS’s activity at higher temperatures (Figure 3). Interestingly, significant enhancement of the activity by the supplement of Mn2+ was found at 50°C over those assayed at 40°C, suggesting the potential of in vitro application in digesting cellulose at elevated temperatures by supplementing enhancing cations.

thumbnailFigure 3. The effects of Mg2+and Mn2+cations, to a final concentration of 1 and 10 mM, on the activity of purified NpaBGS at pH 6.0. The activity of NpaBGS (open square), NpaBGS with Mg2+ (gray square) and NpaBGS with Mn2+ (black square) were compared.

According to previous studies, supplementing divalent or trivalent cations is one strategy to increase enzyme reaction efficiency, thermostability or termination reaction. Different levels of inhibitory effect on enzyme activities by metal ions have been reported, especially Cu2+ and Fe2+ for β-glucosidase [24,29-31]. In a previous study, Ca2+ showed several benefits including protein conformation stabilization, higher affinity for the substrate, and a higher thermostability of an endoglucanase of Clostridium thermocellum[32]. However, Mg2+ and especially Mn2+ showed a stronger enhancement than Ca2+ on the β-glucosidase activity of NpaBGS (Table 3 & Figure 3). In our tests, Al3+, Cu2+ and Fe3+ showed a significant inhibition of NpaBGS activity at 10 mM (Table 3). This indicated that the requirement of free sulfhydryl groups in NpaBGS is similar to those observed in other β-glucosidases [33]. The sequence data also suggested that there are thiol groups presented at the active site that are involved in binding or catalysis, or that such groups are essential for maintaining a proper tertiary structure of the enzyme [34-36]. This is consistent with the suggestion that the cysteine residue is involved in the stability and activity of β-glucosidases [37]. On the other hand, we found the stimulatory effect of ions on NpaBGS (Table 3) as reported in other studies [28,38]. This stimulation has been regarded as promoting a significant reduction in the binding specificity and/or deactivation of the site [39].

Performance of NpaBGS in Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation

Since cellobiose digestion by β-glucosidase might be affected by the end-product feedback inhibition, it is not easy to compare the hydrolytic efficiencies of NpaBGS and Novo 188 (data not shown). We therefore employed a SSF process to compare the efficiencies of NpaBGS and Novo 188. We added an equal amount (2 units) of NpaBGS or Novo 188 separately to 10 ml of yeast cultures with 2 % cellobiose as the sole carbon source and compared their effects on yeast growth. The brewers' yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 and the thermo-stable kefir yeast K. marxianus KY3 [40] were employed in separate experiments. Both cultures showed a better growth profile in cell density with the addition of purified NpaBGS than with the addition of Novo 188 at 30°C (Figure 4A). K. marxianus KY3 was also studied at higher temperatures, i.e., 37°C and 40°C. It grew better at 37°C than at 40°C or 30°C (Figure 4A).

thumbnailFigure 4. The performances of NpaBGS and Novo 188 in SSF at different temperatures. Equal units (2 units) of the two enzymes were added separately to 10 ml yeast cultures with 2 % cellobiose as the sole carbon source and their effects on yeast growth were compared. (A) The cell density assay of growth curve. (B) The ethanol productivity of SSF. SC: S. cerevisiae BY4741; KY3: K. marxianus KY3.

The effects of NpaNGS and Novo 188 on ethanol fermentation in SSF at different temperatures were also studied. When the yeasts were inoculated in SSF at 30°C, the yeast cultured with NpaBGS showed a better performance in ethanol conversion than the yeast cultured with Novo 188; the same results were observed for both yeast hosts KY3 and S. cerevisiae (Figure 4B). In addition, because 40°C is the optimal condition for ethanol production by K. marxianus KY3 [40] and for the enzyme reaction of NpaBGS (Figure 2), a higher ethanol productivity was observed at 40°C than at 37°C and 30°C (Figure 4B). Although the yeasts stopped producing ethanol after 12 h of culturing, more than 50 % cellobiose was converted to ethanol by K. marxianus KY3 in the SSF process at 37°C and 40°C. The efficiency of cellobiose digestion by either NpaBGS or Novo 188 was significantly lowered after 12 hours of reaction (data not shown), but the digested sugar was still sufficient to support a weak growth of the yeasts (Figure 4A). These data indicated that removing the feedback inhibitor (glucose) by yeasts could enhance the activity of β-glucosidase, as reflected by the ethanol productivity by both S. cerevisiae BY4741 and K. marxianus KY3. Note that the ethanol production rate at 40°C and the growth rate at 37°C of K. marxianus KY3 with 2 % cellobiose by the NpaBGS treatment was done using 2 % glucose as the sole carbon source (data not shown). These SSF results indicated that NpaBGS had a significantly higher efficiency for SSF ethanol production by both yeast hosts than Novo 188 at all the temperatures tested, probably due to the faster cellobiose-digestion rate of NpaBGS than Novo 188 under the temperatures tested (30-40°C). In summary, our data indicates that purified NpaBGS is active under a wide range of conditions, with the maximum activity at 40°C in the weak acid condition (pH 5.0-6.0). Moreover, with 1 unit of enzyme, NpaBGS showed a good efficiency in completely converting 2 % cellobiose to glucose within 4 hours in the optimal buffer system (Figure 5). The time course assay with the two enzymes for cellobiose digestion was also examined at 40°C and pH 6.0, and the data indicated that NpaBGS had a slightly better efficiency than Novo 188.

thumbnailFigure 5. The time course assay for cellobiose digestion by NpaBGS or Novo 188. Both enzymatic assays were conducted by incubating each enzyme at 40°C for different durations in 100 mM in Tris–HCl buffer (pH 6.0) and then measured their β-glucosidase activity against cellobiose.

Cellulosic ethanol conversion from napiergrass

In the current process of SSF, the commercial Celluclast 1.5 L is usually employed for converting cellulose to cellobiose or oligosaccharides. Although Celluclast 1.5 L has high exo- and endo-glucanase activities, it has a very low β-glucosidase activity. Therefore, it is necessary to add a β-glucosidase, such as Novo 188, to convert cellobiose to glucose. Instead of adding β-glucosidase, one may transform a β-glucosidase gene into the host. For this purpose, we succeeded in expressing the NpaBGS gene in K. marxianus KY3, and the new strain was employed in SSF using dry napiergrass (2 %) as the feeding stock. While the wild-type KY3 alone could not produce any detectable amount of ethanol, the engineered strain KY3-NpaBGS could produce 1.09 mg/ml ethanol, probably by using the oligosaccharides of napiergrass, such as cellobiose and cellodextrin (Figure 6). Furthermore, as a SSF experiment we added 2 ml of Celluclast 1.5 L to 50 ml yeast cultures and compared their effects on KY3 and KY3-NpaBGS alcoholic fermentation. Again, KY3 produced no detectable amount of ethanol, while the strain KY3-NpaBGS could produce 3.32 mg/ml ethanol from napiergrass in one day aerobic culturing at 40°C (Figure 6). Although the efficiency of ethanol conversion was low, as a proof of concept the experiment showed that the NpaBGS gene has a potential to be applied in SSF or even in CBP if we also introduce both exo- and endo-glucanase genes into the host. The efficiency of ethanol production of SSF can be improved by using an anaerobic system, increasing the copy number of the NpaGNS genes and immobilizing the enzymes on the cell surface.

thumbnailFigure 6. The ethanol productivity of the SSF experiment using 2 % dry napiergrass as the solo carbon source. A 2 ml of Celluclast 1.5 L was added to 50 ml yeast cultures and two different strains, KY3 and KY3-NpaBGS, were inoculated in one day aerobic culturing at 40°C.

For practical applications such as the separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) process, most of the commercial cellulases show a higher efficiency and thermostability at temperatures higher than 40°C [41]. In bio-fuel industry, SSF and simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) are the two major processes currently used for cellulosic-ethanol production. However, most efficient microbes for ethanol production such as brewer’s yeast live below 40°C. For highly efficient SSF or SSCF, the enzymes should have a large capacity to digest the substrates in order to provide carbon sources for the microbes to grow under the same culture condition. A previously characterized rumen cellulase showed an optimal activity at pH from 4.0 to 7.0 and temperature from 35°C to 50°C [18]. In our experiments, two alcoholic fermentation yeasts were chosen to study the performances of NpaBGS and Novo 188 in SSF at different temperatures. Cell density, glucose concentration and ethanol concentration were used to evaluate the SSF efficiency. Although Novo 188 showed better digestion efficiency and thermostability than NpaBGS at higher temperatures (Figure 2), NpaBGS appeared to be superior to Novo 188 at 40°C. Since 40°C is almost the highest temperature for microbe growth and fermentation, NpaBGS has a potential for a direct application in a bio-reactor system and for CBP.

Although the SSF concept has already been published in many previous studies, most of these studies focused on the enzyme cocktail and the enzyme/substrate blending proportion. Indeed, the related enzyme technology focused on enhancing the thermo-stability or increasing the acid tolerance of the cellulolytic enzymes. In this study, we isolated a new beta-glucosidase and showed that it has advantages over the commercial enzyme Novo 188 in SFF applications and that it can be transformed into a host to replace the use of Novo 188. Since NpaBGS was isolated from one of the best nature SSF system, the buffalo rumen, which undergoes microbial fermentation in 38°C, it may have an advantage for constructing an artificial SSF system for yeast ethanol production. We considered a friendly environment for both host growth and the enzyme reaction. This new concept has the potential to reduce the cost as it requires no external supply of beta-glucosidase and it might improve the efficiency of a bio-process, such as SSF or CBP.

Conclusions

We have successfully cloned and expressed an extracellular β-glucosidase from N. patriciarum W5 and investigated its enzymatic properties. The optimal activity was detected at 40°C and pH 5–6, showing that the enzyme prefers a weak acid condition. Moreover, its activity at 50°C could be enhanced by adding Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions. The enzyme, NpaBGS, showed advantages in cell growth, glucose production, and ethanol production over the commercial enzyme Novo 188 in SSF. In addition, it was also employed with Celluclast 1.5 L to conduct an SSF experiment using dry napiergrass as the sole carbon source. The work presented here is the first study that considers an environment that is friendly for both host growth and the enzyme reaction. This new concept can help to improve the efficiency of bio-process, such as SSF and CBP, and it marks a notion to reassess what has missed in the old industry. Although many different fungal β-glucosidases have been identified and cloned, only a few were derived from rumen fungi. In this study, a novel β-glucosidase, NpaBGS, was isolated from buffalo rumen, which is one of the best natural SSF systems for microorganism fermentation at 38°C, and it is shown to have a good potential for an artificial SSF system for ethanol production. .

Methods

Cloning of NpaBGS cDNA

The cDNA of NpaBGS was amplified by PCR using the Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with the gene-specific primers flanked by restriction site sequences, EcoRI/F1-1 (AATTCATGAAGTTCTCATCTGTTTTATCTACTG), EcoRI/F1-2 (CATGAAGTTCTCATCTGTTTTATCTACTG), XhoI/R1-1 (GTTAGTAAAGTTTGTAAGCTCTCTTC), XhoI/R1-2 (TCGAGTTAGTAAA GTT TGTAAGCTCTCTTC), and PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega Corp. Madison, WI, USA). The plasmid DNA from a positive clone was digested with XhoI and EcoRI and subcloned in frame with the P. pastoris pPICZ A expression vector. After sequencing confirmation of the NpaBGS cDNA, the recombinant plasmid, pPA-NpaBGS, was used to transform the P. pastoris GS115 (his4) strain (Invitrogen).

Construction ofPichia pastorisrecombinant strains expressing NpaBGS

Ten μg of the pPICZA-NpaBGS DNA was linearized with BglII and transformed into the yeast P. pastoris GS115 strain by electroporation. A 200 μL aliquot was spread on YPD plates containing 100 μg/mL zeocin and incubated at 30°C. Another aliquot of electroporated cells was spread onto YPD plates containing 1,000 μg/mL zeocin to screen for colonies with high copy insertion. One transformant confirmed for the Mut+ phenotype was scored and grown in 10 mL of BMGY medium. The yeast colony was cultured at 30°C with orbital shaking at 250 rpm for about 20 h until the density reached OD600 of 5.0. The yeast culture was harvested by centrifugation at 2,000 x g for 5 min at room temperature. To induce expression via the AOX1 promoter, the pellet was resuspended in 50 mL of BMMY medium and grown at 30°C with 250 rpm shaking for 5 days, during which methanol was added to the concentration of 0.5 % at 24-hr intervals to maintain induction, and the activity of the culture was examined simultaneously. In order to increase the level of induction, various concentrations of methanol (from 0.5 to 3 %) were also tested.

Purification of recombinant NpaBGS

The yeast broth (4 L) was percolated through filter paper (Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Japan) and concentrated with a stirred ultrafiltration cell (model 8400; Millipore Corp.) equipped with a PM 10 membrane (Millipore Corp., USA) under the nitrogen pressure of 4.0 kg. f/cm2 and dialyzed against 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0). The extracted enzyme was condensated by precipitation at increasing concentrations of ammonium sulfate (0-30 %, 30-50 %, and 50-70 %) at 5°C. The fraction contained better activity and amount of enzyme was found at 50-70 % ammonium sulfate precipitation. The resulting precipitates were collected by cold centrifugation, dissolved in distilled water and dialyzed (0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, 48 h, 5°C) to remove excessive salt. The protein (30 mL) was then loaded onto a Toyopearl DEAE-650 S (Tosoh, Japan) column (2.0× 20 cm) and eluted with a step gradient of 0, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM of NaCl in a volume of 1,000 mL. The fractions showing cellulolytic activity were pooled and concentrated by ultrafiltration, then dialyzed against 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0) containing 0.15 M NaCl. The dialyzed sample (4 mL) was applied to a Sephacryl 300-S HR (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB) column (1.6 × 60 cm) and eluted with the same buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The active fractions were concentrated by ultrafiltration and dialyzed against 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1.5 M (NH4)2SO4. The dialyzed enzyme solution (2.0 mL) was then loaded onto a Resource PHE (Amersham Biosciences, USA) column (1.0 × 1.0 mL) equilibrated with the same buffer containing 1.5 M (NH4)2SO4. The active fractions were eluted with a decreasing linear gradient from 1.5 to 0 M of (NH4)2SO4 in the buffer at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The fractions containing the β-glucosidase activity were further concentrated with an Ultrafree-0.5 centrifugal filter (Millipore Corp., USA), and the purity was checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Protein samples were electrophoresed on 12 % (w/v) SDS–PAGE gels and visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 [42]. The molecular weight markers were obtained from Fermentas (USA). Protein concentration was determined using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, California, USA). Native PAGE electrophoresis was carried out similarly by exclusion of SDS from all solutions. Zymogram after native PAGE was performed as described by Feng et al. [43] and Duan et al. [18].

Characterization of recombinant NpaBGS enzymatic properties

After optimizing the culture conditions of the P. pastoris recombinant strain for producing NpaBGS, the β-glucosidase activity in the culture medium supernatant was measured. β-glucosidase activity was assayed by adding 10 μl of culture supernatant to 90 μL of 2 % (w ⁄ v) cellobiose (low viscosity), and the amount of glucose assay was carried out according to the manual of Glucose (HK) assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). One unit (U) of β-glucosidase activity was defined as the amount of 1 μmole glucose released per minute at pH 7.0 under the assay conditions described below. Furthermore, other natural substrates, such as amygdalin, arbutin, larminarin, phenyl-β-D-glucoside, and β-gentiobiose, and substrates, such as 4-methylumbel-liferyl-β-D-cellobioside (MUC), 4-mehtylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyronoside (MUG) and 4-methylumbel-liferyl-β-D- glucopyranoside (MUD) were also assayed at in the same condition.

The temperature profile and the optimum temperature of NpaBGS were determined by the activity on cellobiose at 30, 40, 50, and 60°C. The optimum pH was determined using 100 mM buffers: sodium citrate (pH 2.0 and 3.0), sodium acetate (from pH 4.0 to pH 6.0) and Tris–HCl (form pH 6 to pH 9). The thermostability of NpaBGS and the commercial enzyme Novo™ 188 (Novozymes, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) were compared by incubation at 40°C in 100 mM in Tris–HCl buffer (pH 6.0) during a time course and then measured their β-glucosidase activity against cellobiose.

To evaluate the effect on the β-glucosidase activity of metal cations, such as Al3+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+, and reducing agents, such as DTT, and β-mercaptoenthanol, these elements were added separately to the standard assay in 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 6.0, to a final concentration of 1 and 10 mM, respectively.

Efficiency of β-glucosidase in SSF application

S. cerevisiae BY4741 and Kluyveromyces marxianus KY3 [40] were used in SSF experiments to study the effect of different culture temperatures. Both yeasts could grow at 30°C on the solid YPAD medium (1 % yeast extract, 2 % peptone, 24 mg/L adenine hemisulfate, 2 % glucose, and 2 % agar), while separate cultures of K. marxianus KY3 was also examined at 37°C and 40°C for its thermotolerance. First, the two microbes were pre-cultured overnight in YPAD medium and inoculated to initial O.D.600nm 0.1 in 10 ml of fresh YPA medium containing either 2 % glucose or 2 % cellobiose under an aerobic condition. The experimental groups were the YPA medium with 2 % cellobiose and supplemented with an equal unit (2 units) of NpaBGS or Novo™ 188 β-glucosidase in the culture. The growth curve, glucose generation and ethanol production of these cultures were determined at 0, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hrs. The cell density was measured at 600 nm by spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 2100 pro, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB). In a parallel experiment, the SSF experiment was conducted using 2 % dry napiergrass as the sole carbon source, and adding 2 ml of commercial Celluclast 1.5 L in a 50 ml yeast culture at 40°C. In addition, K. marxianus KY3 and KY3-NpaBGS, in which KY3 was transformed with the NpaBGS gene via a commercial expression system (K. lactis Protein Expression Kit, New England Biolabs) [40], were used in the SSF experiment. Glucose and ethanol assays were performed using Glucose (HK) assay kits and Ethanol Enzymatic BioAnalysis kits (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Germany) following manufacturer’s procedures.

Abbreviations

CMC = Carboxymethyl cellulose; DTT = Dithiothreitol; MUC = 4-methylumbel-liferyl-β-D-cellobioside; MUD = 4-methylumbel-liferyl-β-D-glucopyranoside; MUG = 4-mehtylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyronoside; SSF = Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

H-L C, Y-C C, J-J C and M-Y J L designed experiments. H-L C, M-Y J L, J-J C, H-M K, S-K R, T-Y W, K-Y H, H-Y C, and W-T L carried out the experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. H-L C, J-J C and T-Y W drafted the manuscript. M-C S and W-H L supervised the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Huang-Mo Sung and Dr. Andrew H.-J. Wang for advice on experiments and Mr. Shang-Lin Tsai, Mr. Bing-Shi Tsai and Dr. Wen-Yih Jeng for their assistance. This research was supported by funding from National Science Council (NSC 96-3114-P-001-004-Y and NSC 97-3114-P-001-001), Taiwan.

References

  1. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS: Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

    Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002, 66(3):506-577. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Theodorou MK, Longland AC, Dhanoa MS, Lowe SE, Trinci APJ: Growth of Neocallimastix sp. strain R1: on Italian ryegrass hay: removal of neutral sugars from plant cell walls.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 1989, 55(6):1363-1367. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Da-Silva R, Gomes E, Franco CML: Pectinases, hemicelulase e cellulases substrate, production application no processamento de alimentos.

    Bol SBCTA 1997, 31:249-250. OpenURL

  4. Wubah DA: Anaerobic zoosporic fungi associated with animals. In Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monotoring Methods. In . Edited by Mueller GM, Bills GF, Foster MS. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA; 2004:501-510. OpenURL

  5. Woodward J, Lima M, Lee NE: The role of cellulase concentration in determining the degree of synergism in the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose.

    Biochem J 1982, 255(3):895-899. OpenURL

  6. Leclerc MAA, Ratomahenina R, Galzy P: Yeast β-glucosidases.

    Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 1987, 5:269-295. OpenURL

  7. Bhat MK, Bhat S: Cellulose degrading enzymes and their potential industrial applications.

    Biotechnol Adv 1997, 15(3–4):583-620. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Shinoyama HTV, Ando A, Fujii T, Sasaki M, Doi Y, Yasui T: Enzymatic synthesis of useful alkyl-β-glucosides.

    Agri Biol Chem 1991, 55:1679-1681. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Saha BC, Freer SN, Bothast RJ: Production, purification, and properties of a thermostable beta-glucosidase from a color variant strain of Aureobasidium pullulans.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 1994, 60(10):3774-3780. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Henrissat B: A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities.

    Biochem J 1991, 280(Pt 2):309-316. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Henrissat B: Glycosidase families.

    Biochem Soc Trans 1998, 26(2):153-156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Dan S, Marton I, Dekel M, Bravdo BA, He S, Withers SG, Shoseyov O: Cloning, expression, characterization, and nucleophile identification of family 3, Aspergillus niger β-glucosidase.

    J Biol Chem 2000, 275(7):4973-4980. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Claeyssens M, Van Tilbeurgh H, Tomme P, Wood TM, McCrae I: Fungal cellulase systems. Comparison of the specificities of the cellobiohydrolases isolated from Penicillium pinophilum and Trichoderma reesei.

    Biochem J 1989, 261(3):819-826. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Eriksson KEL, Blanchette RA, Ander P: Microbial and enzymatic degradation of wood and wood components. Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; 1990. OpenURL

  15. Uzcategui E, Johansson G, Ek B, Pettersson G: The 1,4-β-D-glucan glucanohydrolases from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Reassessment of their significance in cellulose degradation mechanisms.

    J Biotechnol 1991, 21(1–2):143-159. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  16. Trinci APJ, Davies DR, Gull K, Lawrence MI, Nielsen BB, Rickers A, Theodorou MK: Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals.

    Mycol Res 1994, 96(2):129-152. OpenURL

  17. Selinger LB, Forsberg CW, Cheng KJ: The rumen: a unique source of enzymes for enhancing livestock production.

    Anaerobe 1996, 2:263-284. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Duan CJ, Xian L, Zhao GC, Feng Y, Pang H, Bai XL, Tang JL, Ma QS, Feng JX: Isolation and partial characterization of novel genes encoding acidic cellulases from metagenomes of buffalo rumens.

    J Appl Microbiol 2009, 107(1):245-526. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Wang TY, Chen HL, Lu MY, Chen YC, Sung HM, Mao CT, Cho HY, Ke HM, Hwa TY, Ruan SK, Hung KY, Chen CK, Li JY, Wu YC, Chen YH, Chou SP, Tsai YW, Chu TC, Shih CC, Li WH, Shih MC: Functional characterization of cellulases identified from the cow rumen fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum W5 by transcriptomic and secretomic analyses.

    Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4:24. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  20. Henrissat B, Callebaut I, Fabrega S, Lehn P, Mornon JP, Davies G: Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92(15):7090-7094. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  21. Makoto M, Isao O, Sakuzo F, Ichiro Y: Nucleotide sequences of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera genes for extracellular β-glucosidases as expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1988, 54(12):3147-3155. OpenURL

  22. Wong WK, Ali A, Chan WK, Ho V, Lee NT: The cloning, expression and characterization of a cellobiase gene encoding a secretory enzyme from Cellulomonas biazotea.

    Gene 1998, 207:79-86. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Jeya M, Joo AR, Lee KM, Tiwari MK, Lee KM, Kim SH, Lee JK: Characterization of beta-glucosidase from a strain of Penicillium purpurogenum KJS506.

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 86(5):1473-1484. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Harnpicharnchai P, Champreda V, Sornlake W, Eurwilaichitr L: A thermotolerant β-glucosidase isolated from an endophytic fungi, Periconia sp., with a possible use for biomass conversion to sugars.

    Protein Express Purif 2009, 67(2):61-69. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Kim CH, Kim DS: Purification and specificity of a specific endo-beta-1,4-β -glucanase (Avicelase-II) resembling exo-cellobio-hydrolase from Bacillus circulans.

    Enzyme Microbiol Technol 1995, 17(3):248-254. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Meinke A, Damude HG, Tomme P, Kwan E, Kilburn DG, Miller RC, Warren RA, Gilkes NR: Enhancement of the endo-b-1,4-glucanase activity of an exocellobiohydrolase by deletion of a surface loop.

    J Biol Chem 1995, 270(9):4383-4386. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Tomme P, Warren RAJ, Gilkes NR: Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi.

    Adv Microbiol Physiol 1995, 37:1-81. OpenURL

  28. Rubini MR, Dillon AJP, Kyaw CM, Faria FP, Poças-Fonseca MJ, Silva-Pereira I: Cloning, characterization and heterologous expression of the first Penicillium echinulatum cellulase gene.

    J Appl Microbiol 2009, 108(4):1187-1198. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Yeoh HH, Tan TK, Koh SK: Kinetic propeties of β-glucosidases from Aspergillus ornatus.

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1986, 25:25-28. OpenURL

  30. Toonkool P, Metheenukul P, Sujiwattanarat P, Paiboon P, Tongtubtim N, Ketudat-Cairns M, Ketudat-Cairns J, Svasti J: Expression and purification of dalcochinase, a β-glucosidase from Dalbergia cochinchinensis Pierre, in yeast and bacterial hosts.

    Protein Expr Purif 2006, 48(2):195-204. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Shipkowski S, Brenchley JE: Characterization of an unusual cold-active β-glucosidase belonging to family 3 of the glycoside hydrolases from the psychrophilic isolate Paenibacillus sp. Strain C7.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71(8):4225-4232. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  32. Chauvaux S, Beguin P, Aubert JP, Bhat KM, Gow LA, Wood TM, Bairoch A: Calcium-binding affinity and calcium-enhanced activity of Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase D.

    Biochem J 1990, 265(1):261-655. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  33. Wallecha A, Mishra S: Purification and characterization of two β-glucosidases from a thermo-tolerant yeast Pichia etchellsii.

    Biochim Biophys Acta 2003, 1649(1):74-84. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles JK, Jones TA: Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei.

    Science 1990, 249(4967):380-386. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Copa-Patino JL, Broda P: A Phanerochaete chrysosporium β-D-glucosidase/β-Dxylosidase with specificity for (1 → 3)- β-D-glucan linkages.

    Carbohydrate Res 1994, 253:265-275. OpenURL

  36. Ohmiya Y, Takeda T, Nakamura S, Sakai F, Hayashi T: Purification and properties of a wall-bound endo-1,4-b-glucanase from suspension-cultured poplar cells.

    Plant Cell Physiol 1995, 36:607-614. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  37. Hsieh MC, Graham TL: Partial purification and characterization of a soybean β-glucosidase with high specific activity towards isoflavone conjugates.

    Phytochemistry 2001, 58(7):995-1005. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  38. Champreda V, Kanokratana P, Sriprang R, Tanapongpipat S, Eurwilaichitr L: Purification, biochemical characterization, and gene cloning of a new extracellular thermotolerant and glucose tolerant maltooligosaccharide-forming alpha-amylase from an endophytic ascomycete Fusicoccum sp. BCC4124.

    Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2007, 71(8):2010-2020. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  39. Gifford JL, Walsh MP, Vogel HJ: Structures and metal-ion-binding properties of the Ca2+-binding helix–loop–helix EF-hand motifs.

    Biochem J 2007, 405:199-221. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  40. Ho CY, Chang JJ, Huang YR, Wu YC, Li WH, Shih MC, Huang CC: Isolation and characterization of a flavor production kefir yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus KY3: a potential strain for developing co-cultural consolidated bioprocess.

    Biomass Bioenergy 2011.

    revised

    OpenURL

  41. Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M: Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update.

    Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 16(5):577-583. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  42. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

    Nature 1970, 227(5259):680-685. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  43. Feng Y, Duan CJ, Pang H, Mo XC, Wu CF, Yu Y, Hu YL, Wei J, Tang JL, Feng JX: Cloning and identification of novel cellulase genes from uncultured microorganisms in rabbit cecum and characterization of the expressed cellulases.

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 75(2):319-328. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL