Biotechnology for Biofuels

official impact factor 4.15

Open Access Research

Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize (Zea mays L.) stover

Aaron J Lorenz1*, Rob P Anex2, Asli Isci2, James G Coors1, Natalia de Leon1 and Paul J Weimer3

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA

2 Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA

3 USDA-ARS, US Dairy Forage Research Center, Linden Drive West, Madison, WI 53706, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Biotechnology for Biofuels 2009, 2:5 doi:10.1186/1754-6834-2-5

Published: 9 March 2009

Additional files

Additional File 1:

Table S1. Variety means. Abbreviations: Rapid SSF ethanol yield (EtOH yield), percent glucan converted to ethanol (convertibility), acid detergent lignin (ADL), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), in vitro ruminal fermentation (IVR), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD). Glucan, EtOH yield, convertibility, xylan, NDF, IVR, IVTD, and NDFD variety means were ranked in descending order. ADL and lignin variety means were ranked in ascending order.

Format: DOC Size: 118KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 2:

Table S2. Correlations. Pearson product-moment (top diagonal) and Spearman rank (bottom diagonal) correlations between biofeedstock quality, ruminal digestibility, and composition measurements. Correlations were calculated using variety means (n = 12).

Format: DOC Size: 41KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data

Additional File 3:

Table S3. Linear regression models for predicting Rapid SSF ethanol yield. Regression was performed on variety means (n = 12).

Format: DOC Size: 31KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Open Data