Table 10 |
|||
|
Cost parameters included in the sensitivity analysis |
|||
|
Parameter |
% Variation relative to base-case |
Remark |
|
|
|
|||
|
Minimum |
Maximum |
||
|
|
|||
|
Fixed capital investment |
0.7 |
1.3 |
A range of +/- 30% was considered sufficient to cover uncertainties in capital cost. |
|
|
|||
|
Cost of biomass |
0.6 |
1.7 |
A range of -40% to +70% approximates to the 15th and 85th percentiles obtained in the survey of EU cost estimates for softwood and straw. |
|
|
|||
|
Enzymes |
0.5 |
1.5 |
A range of +/- 50% was considered reasonable given the uncertainties in the costs of enzyme production. |
|
|
|||
|
Cost of ethanol |
0.3 |
1.85 |
The minimum -70% reflects the price of ethanol valued on an energy basis with an oil price of US$40 barrel-1. The maximum +85% reflects ethanol valued on a volume basis plus subsidy, assuming an oil price of US$150 barrel-1. |
|
|
|||
|
Solid fuel revenue |
0.7 |
1.3 |
A range of +/- 30% was considered sufficient to cover uncertainties in the retail price of solid fuel. |
|
|
|||
|
Distribution cost |
0.7 |
1.3 |
A range of +/- 30% was considered sufficient to cover uncertainties in distribution cost. |
|
|
|||
|
Effective discount rate |
1 |
2 |
A discount rate range of 7–30% was considered sufficient to cover uncertainties in how a plant may be financed. |
|
|
|||
|
Slade et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2009 2:3 doi:10.1186/1754-6834-2-3 |
|||