Table 6 |
||||
|
System performance metrics for economies of scale ratio and logistical mode scenarios |
||||
|
Liquid transport mode |
||||
|
|
||||
|
EoSR |
Metric |
Units |
Tanker |
Pipeline |
|
|
||||
|
1.28 |
Ethanol cost |
$2007 lEtOH-1 |
0.328 |
0.317 |
|
km |
107 |
107 |
||
|
L:C ratio** |
- |
0.86 |
0.76 |
|
|
No. plants |
- |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Configuration |
- |
Integrated |
Integrated |
|
|
|
||||
|
1.45 |
Ethanol cost |
$2007 lEtOH-1 |
*** |
- |
|
km |
58 |
62 |
||
|
L:C ratio |
- |
0.34 |
0.58 |
|
|
No. plants |
- |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Configuration |
- |
Integrated |
Decentralised |
|
|
|
||||
|
1.65 |
Ethanol cost |
$2007 lEtOH-1 |
- |
- |
|
km |
62 |
62 |
||
|
L:C ratio |
- |
0.69 |
0.59 |
|
|
No. plants |
- |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Configuration |
- |
Decentralised |
Decentralised |
|
|
|
||||
|
*The average unit-biomass transport distance **The ratio between logistics costs and process capital and operating costs ***Production costs for EoSR scenarios are not considered valid owing to distortions of relative and absolute component costs |
||||
|
Dunnett et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2008 1:13 doi:10.1186/1754-6834-1-13 |
||||